Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
We can confirm that the information you have requested is held in part by Northumbria Police.
We are able to disclose the located information to you as follows with the below caveats to be noted:
You asked:
NOTE: This question relates to disciplinary hearings that concluded and were recorded in the 2022-23 and 2023-24 financial year regardless of when the actual incident took place or when the allegation was first investigated.
1. i. In the 2022-23 and 2023-24 financial years please statei. how many of your police officers (not civilian staff, specials or PCSOs) were the subject of a disciplinary sanctions of ANY description because they were found to have had sex while on duty, and
|
Year |
Count |
|
2022/23 |
2 |
|
2023/24 |
1 |
ii. how many of these officers were dismissed from the force?
All 3 Police Officers were dismissed.
2.Of these officers please provide a breakdown between (i) male officers and (ii) female officers?
All 3 Police Officers are male.
3.Of these officers please provide a breakdown between
i. those having sex with a fellow officer,
None.
ii. those having sex with a member of the public, and
3 Police Officers.
iii. those having sex with a fellow officer and a member of the public (although obviously not necessarily at the same time)?
None.